I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS HAS HAPPENED. I KNOW THAT AS OF THIS MORNING I HAD ALL MY BLOGS. NOW A FEW HOURS LATER, I SEE THAT THEY HAVE JUST DISAPPEARED MAGICALLY.
I DO KNOW IT WASN'T ME WHO REMOVED THEM BECAUSE OF SILLY THREATS FROM A INDIVIDUAL WHO LOVES TO CRY FOUL, AND IS FIGHTING VARIOUS CHARGES WHICH THE FTC IS HANDLING.
WHEN SOMEONE VIOLATES LAWS GOVERNORING THE USA, OR COMMITTES A CRIME ( MURDER, FRAUD, CHILD ABUSE, RAPE ETC ) DOESN'T THAT MAKE THEM A CRIMINAL? THE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE IN MY BLOGS AND CRYING FOUL, THREATENING SLANDER, LIBEL ETC, JUST DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON.
WELL TOO BAD, IT IS PUBLIC INFORMATION AND THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO BE AWARE WHO & WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. WITH SO MUCH FRAUD GOING ON IN THE USA, HOW IS ONE TO STOP IT, IF THEY DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE, IF THE CRIMINAL JUST GOES ON THEIR MERRY WAY AND CONTINUE'S TO OPEN UP NEW SCAM SHOPS?
LET ME KNOW WHAT YOUR THOUGHTS ARE ON THIS...........
HERE IS A TRACK RECORD FOR EXAMPLE, HOW THESE INDIVIDUALS JUST IGNORED FEDERAL JUDGEMENTS, PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS ETC, DATED BACK TO 2002 TO THE PRESENT 2008.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/bayarea/040510orderbayarea.pdf
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2002/09/bayareabccmp.pdf
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/bayarea/050203stipbayarea.pdf
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/bayarea/080228memo.pdf
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823028/index.shtm
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823028/080228complaint.pdf
32 comments on UNBELIEVABLE, SEE BLOG, NOW YOU DON'T? WHERE DID IT GO?
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster
It may seem like magic, but when posts disappear it is no pleasant trick.
Public knowledge is public knowledge, pure and simple. You may include some opinion, but you provide facts, references, and links. As long as honesty and credibility remain in place, your posts are sharing what is available for the public to know.
Well I found out why my last 2 blogs were deleted by Team. It seems that Christopher Tomasulo was threatening to sue the site for allowing me to supposely slander his rep. Totally untrue, just the legal facts, with various documents were posted, and even though he is in a whole lot of trouble for violating his permanent injunction, facing more legal actions for getting involved with Safe Harbor Foundation, Silverstone Lending LLC & Silverstone Financial LLC and the same bunch from the telemarketing scheme. Wondering if he just forgot that there is strong evidence to show his total involvement in these activities? There are legal documents, and victims who will testify against him in court. He was positively ID as the individual in those offices in Clearwater, Florida..... After viewing his picture..... Go figure.....
Maybe he believes his "Power of Persuasion" will change things for him legally, but I wouldn't count on it, if I was in his shoes.
Interesting reading to google is: Doc Sulo, master of power of persuasion......... Its all so covert?
He also thinks that trashing victims will help him, it is not about the victims, it is about the illegally activities committed against the victims and their homes.
RESOURCES:
http://www.copywritersboard.com/member-content/4775-worlds-greatest-persuader-my-secret.html
Accelerated Persuasion. A sprinkling of past issues of the original Dr. Sulo's Accelerated Persuasion Newsletter (at it's peak had over 30000 subscribers ...
acceleratedpersuasion.blogspot.com/ - 75k
http://acceleratedpersuasion.blogspot.com/2001/05/installing-custom-criteria.html
Let me know what you think after checking this crap out.
Marianna Kathie Gonzcol Viseglie,
I think you've misunderstood. I really don't care how many links you put up about lawsuits I'm in. I don't care about you putting up a link to a stipulation I made with the FTC. I certaintly don't care about you promoting my blog.
What I do care about is the fact that you are calling me a criminal. I'm not. All of the links you reference are CIVIL cases. PERIOD.
As to your BS definitions of "criminal"...
if your definition of "criminal" is taken as true then anyone who ever jaywalked, got a traffic ticket or any other NON-CRIMINAL legal infractiion is a "criminal." That's simply not the case.
Once again I'm going to ask you to CEASE AND DESIST. Your blog plost references "rape," "murder" and other crimes and then links to various CIVIL court cases in which I am involved.
I also don't like you misrepresenting my words. I have not threatened Blosgster with a lawsuit. However, I am telling you that if you continue to Libel me I WILL SUE YOU.
You are playing games and I don't like games. If you'd like to continue with the BS I will send you the 5 day notice required to sue you for Libel Per Se.
As you've admitted before, you have never had any dealings with me in any form until you started posting your ridiculous crap on the Internet.
So.. you are either a sick woman that needs help or you are in the midst of some sort of SCAM by which you are trying to use me as a scapegoat for a transaction I was never a part of. Either way you've got problems.
Get help and stop this nonsense, but in the meantime and for the FINAL TIME - Cease and Desist.
-Christopher Tomasulo
No where is the word criminal used in the post! Alas I stated illegal activities. I think your the one who needs help in understanding something. There are public records with your signature on them, which are infact Silverstone doc's, why don't you look through the records county by county and than try and explain why your signature is on them with Porcelli's & Toth. And you had dealings with a victim, who has clearly id you as the one he talked too. Mind you it isn't the Zsigmond family, but someone else.
For the record, if you decide to sue, do make sure it is Maria Friedmayer, as I keep telling you, I have taken over this blog site. While your at it why don't you google me.......... You tried very hard to slander, libel kath on care2, but that backfired on you, when she had to go and verify your lies regarding ferran with the FBI, USPIS and SS offices. Than you decided to recant those lies. Would you like me to post them to remind you. As with Porcelli offering back the title to the home to my friend kath on care2 blog a few days before he left for prison. Your memory isn't so good on those facts are they.
I also have never met you, thank GOD for that. But I do feel that everyone should know who is involved in this mess, and your name does infact pop up in alot of complaints. Maybe if you would have just stayed away after the first mess, you wouldn't be having problems now.
Yes the FTC cases dated Feb 28, 2008 are civil cases, 1- contempt of violating your permanent injunction placed on you in the telemarketing credit card scam, and a new case:
FTC Charges Mortgage Foreclosure “Rescuers” with Deceiving HomeownersIn an ongoing effort to crack down on businesses that prey upon homeowners facing foreclosure, the Federal Trade Commission has charged six businesses and three individuals with violating the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), the FTC Act, and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) by enticing homeowners into high-cost, short-term loans secured by an additional mortgage on their homes. The FTC will seek to bar the defendants from further violations, make them forfeit their ill-gotten gains, and stop collection and foreclosure actions or efforts to seize or transfer properties.
The defendants are Safe Harbour Foundation of Florida, Inc., Silverstone Lending, LLC, Silverstone Financial, LLC, Southeast Advertising, Inc., Keystone Financial, LLC, MT25 LLC, Peter J. Porcelli II, Bonnie A. Harris, and Christopher Tomasulo.
According to the FTC’s complaint, Safe Harbour, Porcelli, Harris, and Tomasulo target homeowners facing foreclosure with claims such as “We have all the funds available to pay your bills and save your home from foreclosure. GUARANTEED!” The Silverstone companies and Keystone then provide high-cost, interest-only, short-term balloon-payment loans secured by second mortgages on homes already subject to foreclosure.
The lenders allegedly violate HOEPA by extending credit based on the value of consumers’ collateral without regard to their repayment ability, by requiring balloon payments after only six months, by providing negatively amortized loans that cause consumers to owe more at the end of the loan than at the beginning, and by failing to make required disclosures. They allegedly violate TILA by grossly understating the annual percent rate (APR) and finance charges. For example, in at least one instance the disclosed APR was 28 percent but the actual APR was more than 100 percent.
All of the defendants are charged with violating TILA and its implementing Regulation Z by failing to make timely written disclosures and by failing to disclose accurately the amount being financed, the finance charge, the annual percentage rate, the payment schedule, the total payment amount, and the fact that the creditor has or will acquire a security interest in the consumer’s home. They also allegedly violate the FTC Act by understating the APR for the loans.
In a related civil contempt action, the FTC alleges that this conduct by Porcelli, Harris, Tomasulo, and others violates court orders entered in FTC v. Bay Area Business Council (see press releases dated May 13, 2004 and February 3, 2005), which prohibit them from marketing credit-related products to consumers.
The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 5-0. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.
The lawsuit on behalf of the victims in Tampa, Florida is also a civil suit, dated Oct 12, 2007.
But did you know that the victims are also in the process of filing a criminal suit against all parties involved with Silverstone Lending LLC, Silverstone Financial LLC, Safe Harbor Foundation, Mt25 LLC, Keystone Financial LLC. Your name is included in that case too.
So why don't you just wait and see how it all goes, than threaten slander, libel or as you say "Libel per Se". I don't think you want anymore trouble than you already are faced with legally. If you want though, I am sure kath can be persuaded to file a slander suit against you for the care2 blog lies on your part.
As for being a sick person that you keep claiming I am, even though you can't grasp that I Maria Friedmayer am the person now blogging for this web page, I am not the one using persuasion methods on people minds, now thats sick....... maybe I need to alert the law enforcement and file a complaint against you for harassing me.
Civil cases are generally brought by private individuals or corporations seeking to collect money owed or monetary damages. A criminal case is brought by the local, state or federal government in response to a suspected violation of law and seeks a fine, a jail sentence or both.
Site Search:If you have information about a crime committed, contact Crime Stoppers anonymously at
(954) 493-TIP
The homeowners are persueing both civil & criminal cases.
can't believe they are allowed to remove that poost
The Admin should have explained their reasons to remove before actually doing so.
Post in a variety of sites; this would make it difficult.
But make certain you are in the 'right' before making claims. Google may help in this regard.
"The Admin should have explained their reasons to remove before actually doing so."
Agreed.
SigmaX
Maybe Fraudsters should explain why her "friend" (lol) - Kathie Visceglie - and a bunch of other people dropped CT and a whole bunch of other defendants from their lawsuit if they are "victims."
It's good to see that Blogster is the site that allows morons to post lies and all kinds of defamatory content. Shit - what other outlet would they have considering most sites normal TOS's? It would be un-American NOT to have a site like this - right? (sigh)
Don't know who has been dropped out of any lawsuits, but I do know that the FTC & various Law Enforcement Agencies are activitely investigating all parties involved......... So you may be out of one issue, but there is alot more coming back at you....... I will have to ask and find out about the lawsuit........ SIGH
Interesting tactic. Let’s sue a bunch of people and companies with no basis whatsoever and see what sticks. $15 Million, Hmmmmmmm, sounds gooooood. The lack of research, like who lives where and the misspelling of names doesn’t matter. However, hopefully, some of them will not answer, and we can get a default judgment… and lets add 20 John Does as well, just for fun, so if this goes through, we can mess with some more random people… And also, why would we need to add facts to a lawsuit, anyway, when murky generalities should do just fine…
Then the unimaginable happens. Some people actually point it out to the judge that the lawsuit makes no sense and the Judge agrees. What a shock…
So lets drop some defendants that might fight back the frivolous suit. Defendants like one of the lawyers, the title company and its employees, the loan servicing company and JOHN DOES No. 1-20. We obviously cannot get anything out of them… Let’s hope that this might covers up the fact that the suit still makes no sense, there are still no facts listed and the whole thing is a mess. Also, the guy who picks up the phone and the notary seem to be a good targets... Let's leave them in there...
Then, some defendants still fight back at the nonsense…
Reading the motions, plaintiffs realize that some plaintiffs have to be dropped as well, since they have no case whatsoever… and the Zsigmonds, just like that, are gone...
Suddenly, the unimaginable happens again. The judge does not like the fact that his order is violated and the amended complaint contains nothing that can be used for a lawsuit. However he is fair and gives another chance to get things right, but threatens monetary sanctions against plaintiffs and their attorney.
So it is the plaintiffs' move again. Okay, lets drop some more defendants, obviously the guy who picks up the phones and the notary are fighting back too hard, and it can not be helped that there is no case against them, so they are dropped, Also lets drop another company that was not involved at all, bam, its gone too…
Now lets wait and see… and hope… maybe… fingers are crossed…
I wouldn't gloat too much, my bets are on the victims.
First let me say, that I am not involved in this case. I am simply an outsider watching this nonsense from the sidelines. I do not perceive those comments as gloating. They are facts, I have read the case file and the associated public records (mortgage documents of this plantiff). Unfortunetly things are not always what they appear to be. I have read the mortgage documents that she signed and initialed every single page. Which takes a good amount of time to do. There was a aslo something very important in the mortgage that she signed. It is called a 3-day right of rescission. Which allows the person to re-read the documents and cancel the loan within 3 business days of signing. Here is the thing. Her house was in foreclosure from her original lender. Any A, B, or C lender would not refinance her because of that fact. No underwriter would touch that loan they all require you to be on time and no more than one 30 day late payment in a certain amount of time.
Now, the lender that came in to help her, simply offered the only solution out there for her to save her house. The fact is that she did not follow the guidelines that SHE agreed to. Took money from this lender, cashed the check and still did not pay her mortgage. Now, had she not taken this lenders help she would STILL have lost her house only sooner by her own fault. Let us all remember that she did not pay the original lender either. The new lender gave her time to either sell her home or try to get new financing. There is no fraud here. She signed every page of the closing documents and had time to cancel and did not...........FACT!!!!! Sorry that the truth hurts. But black is still black even though she is calling it blue.
I have done my research also, so these people who have violated federal permnant injunctions, placed on them for a credit card & telemarketing scheme dating back to early 2000, is ok, looks like thats what your saying here. Mind you it was a lifetime ban.
They all were banned for life by a federal judge, yet they just went ahead and started another scam, but this time for bigger bucks, thats ok with you? Trying to turn the tables on the victims for unlawful actions isn't right and thats why the FTC has filed 2 seperate charges against all these people like Porcelli, Tomasulo, Kimoto and others plus their companies right? Other law agencies are now involved also. No right to continue scamming anyone, got it, anyone. Hope they all get what they really deserve, since they should all be considered as Kimoto, a economic danger to the community.
FACT!!!!! Sorry the TRUTH HURTS, black is black even though you think it is blue.
You're saying that the notary public (whom you- Kathie Visceglie- sued) is banned from witnessing signatures?
Also, you are flat wrong. The FTC knew that Porcelli was doing mortgages in 2005. If they thought that the ban applied to mortgages don't you think they would have (should have) brought it up then?
Even so, I don't see how notaries, title companies and John Does have anything to do with your ridiculous cases and neither did a Federal Judge.
You and you're so called "victims" (aka non-mortgage paying freeloaders) are trying to scam you're way out of paying mortgages you owe - period. The sick part is you're trying to use the US government to achieve your ends and since it's politically correct to consider someone that owes $122,000 on a home that is valued at $122,000 a "homeowner" (ridiculous and unheard of in the early and sane years of this wonderful country) you actually are at an advantage. But even the most politically biased judge is not going to consider someone who takes oaths and witnesses signatures a player in your so called "scam." Really - are you serious? Do you honestly think you were a "victim" of someone who witnessed your signature and took your oath that you read all the documents? You did read all the documents right? That was your initials on every page right? Wait - let me guess - you (a person who speaks Hungarian) didn't understand the Hungarian notary - that's your story - right. Or at least that was your story to a Pasco County Judge.
Any more lies in furtherance of your scheme? Any other lies you'd like to tell to try to turn your sorry ass into a "pay it forward" saint?
It doesn't matter if every alphabet agency in the world is investigating people. They'll find the same thing a Federal Judge did - That it's ridiculous that you are blaming people that either
A. Never dealt with you
B. People who witnessed your signature or took your SWORN oath
C. People that actually paid money to get you out of foreclosure
D. People that paid your mortgage AFTER they got you out of foreclousre and
E. 20 to 30 people whom you thought you'd sue just for the hell of it
Taking your sick thought process to it's final conclusion - hopefully the government will give everyone a free house then we can be a nice socialist country like the one you came from.
Are you sure you're not related to anyone with the last name Lenin (or Stalin)?
I see that a few people have made some really stupid comments while my family & I were away.
I guess one of the individuals has nothing better to do with his or her life than continue to harass me and the victims, how sad for him or her. Even though he or she has a shitload of legal problems ongoing. Doesn't even have the balls to post under his or her name, but goes under "Anonymous".
I will continue to post information on the ongoing cases that pretain to these individuals, as I am updated by the victims. I did find some very interesting info, need to check first if it can be posted, it is quite shocking. I have passed it along to the victims though.
Next step is to see if I can file charges against a certain individual for continuing to come on this blog and harass me and one of the victims involved. I have had enough of this individuals continuing bullshit. My husband and I need to protect our 4 children from this sick individual.
None of the victims in caught in this scam have had any legal issue's, unlike you and the rest of the scammers gang, they violated no laws unlike you all have past & present! As for the FTC, it will be brought to their attention that you have claimed that they knew back in 2005, Porcelli's new activities? Very doubtful.
Some answers to your abc list
A. Never dealt with you
Right, never dealt with you, since I am not a victim, nor anyone in my family!
B. People who witnessed your signature or took your SWORN oath
Not a victim, so of course its not my signature or my sworn oath your talking about!
C. People that actually paid money to get you out of foreclosure
Oh, so your way of thinking it sounds like that makes it okay to charge illegal rates and violate a bunch of state and federal laws governing mortgages, plus violating the permnant injunctions placed against all of you merits less than a slap on the hand for all of you? And also by doing so committed more illegal actions, maybe thats why the FTC has filed NEW FEB 2008 charges. Don't you think? They just don't and go and file charges against anyone unless there is suffient evidence now do they? The other investigations wouldn't be ongoing either, now would they? And again I am not one of the victims!
D. People that paid your mortgage AFTER they got you out of foreclousre and
From my understanding, after stealing the various homes, they expected the victims to pay thousands of dollars a month, again very illegal according to state and federal mortgage laws in place. Thats when the first victim filed charges filed various charges. He was informed by the bank that what was happening was illegal and to get in touch with various state and federal agencies. After filing the charges and doing some research on the various individuals, it all came out about the long legal issue's everyone had been involved in. Again I am not a victim involved in these cases!
E. 20 to 30 people whom you thought you'd sue just for the hell of it
You would think that way, 90 % involved knew only too well what was going on, more will come out on that front too, don't worry, but not civil this time. Why do you think all this is going on? Because your all innocent? Plus its the attorney handling the case and makes the decisions why don't you ask him?
As for your comment "You and you're so called "victims" (aka non-mortgage paying freeloaders) are trying to scam you're way out of paying mortgages you owe - period"
It looks more like you all are the freeloaders trying to scam innocent homeowners - Period! Charges were filed against you all, not the victims, is this a point you seem not to remember too well?
Get over it already, just because you were dropped out of 1 lawsuit, doesn't make you innocent, Investigations are ongoing. Whats the matter, you don't like the fact that the FTC and other agencies know you and the others violated the injunction placed against you all? Well too bad, maybe you should have steered clear of the parties you were involved with for the credit card and telemarketing scam. You should be more careful who you choose to hangout with maybe, no?
Alittle info for you, the victim that you dealt with wasn't named in the lawsuit at all, but will be coming forward to testify that it was you infact that did his loan doc's in the clearwater office. Zsigmond's were dropped because the loan didn't involve Porcelli, just his flyer for Safe Harbour Foundation, but it certainly involved you and another party, things will happen there shortly.
Are you sure you are not related to Hilter, Lenin or Stalin yourself? Anyone who tries to play with peoples minds are just plain sick and really needs some help.
"Taking your sick thought process to it's final conclusion"
As you stated above, what do you think? Should you all be allowed to walkaway free and clear after knowingly violating a permanant injunction and scamming some more, laughing at a federal judges orders placed against you all? Ha Ha thats wishful thinking on your part. Jail time would be alot better this time around as you all should be considered a danger to any and all communities like Kimoto is.
Now please go somewhere else with you stupid master mind persuading shit, before I take legal action against you for harassment.
Hey dumb ass (Kathie Visceglie)-
I didn't post any of the last few comments. I thank you for giving me credit (since some but not all of it makes sense), but obviously someone else knows you are a liar and a piece of shit.
Stop ASS-uming things which are incorrect - you'll just make an ass out of yourself.
-Christopher Tomasulo
PS- Harassment is what you are doing not me. I just respond to your harassments. In addition, I've never had any dealings with you in any shape or form until you started harassing me on the internet.
PPS - I never had anything to do with "doing" loan docs for any person at any time (in my entire life). So regardless of whom is going to testify to that (blatantly false) "fact" - THEY ARE A LIAR - and believe me when I say they will be proven to be the liar they are.
PPPS- If you don't want a response on a public blog then just keep calling the St. Louis Postal Inspector with your lies along with the lies you send in your emails you send to your "group." Don't worry no one will see those (lol). Half truths are not the truth. If you write lies or half truths about me (or misrepresent anything about me in any way - TO ANYONE) you'll be held accountable.
PPPPS - Continually calling the St. Louis Missouri Postal Inspector to check out my blog is ridiculous. Why not just have your guy subscribe? - it would be a lot easier (The subscription box is Is in the upper right hand corner).
PPPPPS - You're a moron and I truly hope the final result of all this is that you are punished severely by a judge for for your continuous perjuries, libel and numerous lies.
In response to you
Anonymous said 34 minutes ago
"I didn't post any of the last few comments. I thank you for giving me credit (since some but not all of it makes sense), but obviously someone else knows you are a liar and a piece of shit."
Stop ASS-uming things which are incorrect - you'll just make an ass out of yourself.
-Christopher Tomasulo
Hey dirtbag (Christopher Tomasulo) so why are you answering as Anonymous. Oh I forgot your so covert........ You think you know it all, but your just a joke. And while your at it, why don't you stop ASS-uming which are incorrect - you are just making a ass out of yourself!
Thats right, any information gotten on you is passed onto all agencies, by Kath and others. Can't handle that, well to bad.
I am now telling you for the last time continue to harass me Mrs Maria Friedmayer and I will sue you moron. As well as Kath, will also file harassment charges against you. What, can't handle the fact, that someone other than Kath and victims wants to see you finally get what you deserve under the law? Your the one with past and present legal issue's, not the victims. You really crack me up, at least I get to laugh at your stupidity.
PS - love those pics you posted, disgusting is the best word for that shit. That makes you the piece of shit.
PPS - love the comments about your writting to the Judge while enjoying yourself in a strip club. How do you have so much time on your hands to hang in filthy places like that?
PPPS - You are one sick man, and I have had it with your bullshit! Let the various courts decide what is what!
Okay, let's assume for a minute that you are Maria Friedmayer, as you keep claiming so loudly.
So, your idea, "Maria", of living on the edge is that you post lies and generalities on people that you don't even know and have no dealings with whatsoever (your own admission).
How can you be so pissed at people that you have never met, and who have never hurt you in any way, that you keep posting defamatory statements on them? I mean you have never met and have never had any dealings with these people. You just wrote that in one of you comments above.
Now, either you are lying about your identity, or you are actually Kathie Visceglie, trying to pass herself off as someone else. (Not very smartly I might add), or you are just plain nuts "Maria": Who would risk getting sued for someone else? You must owe "Kath" big...
Have you heard the term "Innocent until proven guilty..."?
Aaaah mr anonymous again
No lies have been posted about anyone, between offical court records, victims loans doc's, victims placing id's, googling, etc, it is all there. Just because I am not a victim in any of the cases doesn't mean that I cannot try and help these families.
You just don't like it that I use the word criminal or anything that has to do with criminal actions. Those definitions posted early were taken from the Merriam Websters Dictionary and Thesaurus, which you claimed to be bullshit definitions.
As for me being "so pissed at people that you have never met, and who have never hurt you in anyway that you keep posting defamatory statements on them", is not true. You just refuse to accept that hanging with the wrong crowd has gotten you into trouble again.
My comments last night about the strip club and your writings to the judge are on the internet, which you posted on various sites like twitter.com, summize.com, picasaweb.google.com, i302.photobucket.com with docsulo name attached. I am informing you that all this was forwarded to the various people who may need to see this stuff you have been posting recently.
As for this comment of yours "you are just plain nuts "Maria": Who would risk getting sued for someone else? You must owe "Kath" big...
A- I am far from nuts, just hate it when people try to take advantage of a persons plight.
B- Kath is one of my closest and dearest friends, we don't do tit for tat. Its about true friendships. After watching what you guys tried to do to her on care2, we as her friends decided to pitchin with researching and whatever these families may need. You have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to Kath or her family. She has one of the biggest hearts a person could have, so you try and trash her and we fight back. Maybe you should really found out who you were trashing first. This lady has been to hell and back because of good heart and intentions, and we will not allow anyone to hurt her or her family any longer. So no I don't owe Kath anything.
As for this comment of yours "Have you heard the term "Innocent until proven guilty..."?"
I believe I answered back last night with "PPPS - You are one sick man, and I have had it with your bullshit! Let the various courts decide what is what!
Please do remember that if Kath was so bad as you claim, than why did Porcelli offer her back her home on care2 just before he left for federal prison back in Jan 2008? For his actual kindness I do know that Kath will keep her word and try to help Porcelli when this is all over with. Also please remember that just because a family or person is having hard times doesn't give anyone the right to scam them.
If you would like I can surely post all the websites you have posted, let me know. It is all the same sites that were sent to everyone early last week regarding you.
Oh by the way, you took your pages and pictures down too late. Not only is it on a hard copy disc, but in reality all the sites were sent out early last week.
We were wondering how long it would take you to take the pic's off and hide it all. But no matter the people that needed to see it all already has. If you are such a nice guy, why did it disappear today from the web? It was there early this morning?
You may think that everyone is stupid, but by putting it on a disc for evidence, I guess that was a smarter move.
Now like I said last night, why don't we just wait and see how the justice system handles all these cases.
Have a nice evening.
Helping someone is one thing. But risking a lawsuit for that same person, just out of the kindness of your heart, is a sign of mental imbalance.
That is like saying that you want to help someone by stealing for him or her. It is as crazy as it sounds.
If you are really not "Kath" then congratulations... I guess, “Birds of a feather flock together."
By the way, I don’t know why would you think that everyone that posts on your public blog and does not share your opinion would be the same person…
"Helping someone is one thing. But risking a lawsuit for that same person, just out of the kindness of your heart, is a sign of mental imbalance."
Maybe in your world, but not my world which is reality. Good Karma always follows with more Good Karma.
"That is like saying that you want to help someone by stealing for him or her. It is as crazy as it sounds."
Maybe thats your thought process, but certainly not mine. Maybe thats why everyone involved with Porcelli is in trouble now again for the second time. Whats your thoughts on that? Just curious.
"If you are really not "Kath" then congratulations... I guess, “Birds of a feather flock together."
Good Birds always stick together as so does the bad Birds, happy I belong to the good flock.
By the way, I don’t know why would you think that everyone that posts on your public blog and does not share your opinion would be the same person…
You give yourself away with your style of writing, your so easy to pick off. Plus you keep defending yourself as you tried on care2, while trying to trash Kath and the other victims. Than all of suddened all the pictures disappear on your websites? You don't have to be Einstein to realize that.
Its called Good Karma "what goes around comes around" ponder that for alittle while.
Like I said before why don't we wait for what the courts will decide in all the cases, or till proven either innocent or guilty?
This seriously will be my last response to you, since I don't have the time to waste with 4 kids, plus it is summer vacation.
Have a good night.
I'm wondering... What reason could there be to drop people and companies from a lawsuit if they were guilty? It is a straight question. Could you give a straight answer, please?
Kathie wrote: "Aaaah mr anonymous again"
Kathie I'll say it again: STOP ASSUMING THINGS.
When I write a comment to you I DON'T DO IT ANONYMOUSLY. I write my name at the bottom of the comment.
Your Blogster site no longer allows people to put there names in when commenting only an email address and I put my REAL e-mail address every time I comment.
I'm flattered that you see me in every comment put on your blog but that's probably just a symptom that you could be obsessed with me. SCARY.
As far as any pictures I put up - SO WHAT? You can follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/docsulo or feedfriend.com/docsulo or look me up on Summize using docsulo. So can anyone else. I don't put up things on public sites not knowing that the PUBLIC CAN SEE THEM.
And I don't know what world you are from but a picture from a magazine photo shoot with me and two girls in bikinis is not disgusting at all where I come from. Are you jealous? Again - SCARY.
It's really simple Kathie - when I respond to you I sign off using my real name like this:
-Christopher Tomasulo
PS - Get a grip. Again, I'm flattered that you see me wherever you go and whatever you do but it's not reciprocal.
Hey "Maria", I just saw your nice vacation story.
So a little basic math for you you, your husband and 4 kids is NOT a family of 5... (let me spell this out: 2 + 4 = 6)
By the way. You supposedly have all those super secret goverment trackers installed on your blog... So how come that you can not figure out that more than one person is answering you posts???
We wish all the victims the best, don't let these schemer's get to you. Very worthy fight, maybe it will others in the end.
They might be "victims" but they are not victims of many of the people they are naming. That's just plain wrong - being half right and getting the other half wrong still makes you wrong.
Honestly, saying you were victimized by a notary public? Come on.
UNBELIEVABLE,...
A homeless person is sitting outside a Publix. He is dirty and smelly, but also, obviously, he is very hungry. You want to help him, so you run inside and buy him a sandwich. He grabs it with his dirty hands and starts devouring it. Later he gets sick because the dirt on his hand got on the sandwich he ate.
Then he sues you for all your money. He says that he got sick because he ate the sandwich you bought for him. He also starts spreading that you are a criminal, because you are a defendant in a law suit.
People start to take his side: You must be the cause of all his misery, because if you haven’t had gotten a sandwich for him, he would have not gotten sick, right? I mean he wasn't a hungry dirty bum to begin with. There must be someone else he can blame...
What is the moral of the story? We should not help hungry bums on the street? You figure that out for yourself.
Stranger things have happened...
It is a great analogy!.... You have made a very good point!
Kyle
Yeah, right........ Kyle???????? No computer access in jail!!!!!!!!!
Are you referring to my comment?... I do not really get what your comment has to do with mine unless you think there is only one person with this first name....wake up woman!!!
Kyle